The practice of film censorship has been in Indonesia since the Dutch East Indies era, and since then has always been the battleground for film stakeholders. The different values and norms among the film stakeholders generate multiple views on film censorship. This research tried to look on the discursive contestation of the film censorship in Indonesia through the perspective of the sociology of communication. This research used the constructivist paradigm and the case study method. Data collection was done through collecting media reports on four films that stumbled upon the censorship issue after the enactment of the 2009 Film Law, which are The Act of Killing, The Look of Silence, Naura & Genk Juara and Kucumbu Tubuh Indahku, as well as interviewing four different film stakeholders, which are a manager of an alternative cinema, a representative of the Indonesian Film Board (BPI) who used to be involved in the Indonesian Film Society (MFI), and a film director-actor. The research results indicated that disharmony among the film stakeholders happened as they value different values and norms, which resulted in the emergence of the discursive contestation of film censorship.